首页> 外文OA文献 >Framing coastal squeeze: Understanding the integration of Mega-nourishment schemes into the Dutch coastal management solutions repertoire: An interpretive analysis of coastal management processes
【2h】

Framing coastal squeeze: Understanding the integration of Mega-nourishment schemes into the Dutch coastal management solutions repertoire: An interpretive analysis of coastal management processes

机译:遏制沿海挤压:了解将巨型营养计划整合到荷兰沿海管理解决方案库中:对沿海管理流程的解释性分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Ewert Aukes’ dissertation takes an interpretive perspective to study the meaning-making processes that led to the realization of three Dutch coastal management projects. Coastal management has a long tradition in the Netherlands, which has made it well-known across the globe. Recently, coastal managers have come up with a new alternative to protecting sandy coasts, the mega-nourishment scheme. The three projects studied in the thesis are all subtypes of the mega-nourishment scheme. They are to a different degree innovative in their use of sand as material for nourishing beaches, i.e. applying large amounts of sand to beaches or foreshores to improve coastal protection performance while at the same time increasing potential for economic, recreational and nature development. In-depth, qualitative interviewing was the main source of data in this dissertation. Participants in the projects' decision-making were interviewed to gain insight into the argumentative meaning-making processes associated with the realization of the projects. The empirical work covered in this dissertation reveals different types of policy framing as dominant processes of meaning-making. In one case, policy frames initially limit the convergence of actors over solutions. In another case, a proficient meaning-making actor succeeded in framing its proposal as a solution for different problems at the same time. The results help to understand how coastal management is ‘made’ in the Netherlands. Coastal management is at first sight a technical, perhaps even technocratic policy domain. Nevertheless, meaning-making and framing, specifically, is just as important in this policy domain as it is in others. Besides their value for interpretive studies of coastal management and policy-making in general, the research this dissertation presents also opens up new avenues for practitioners to position themselves in coastal management processes.
机译:埃韦特·奥克斯(Ewert Aukes)的论文以解释性的视角研究了导致三个荷兰沿海管理项目实现的意义形成过程。沿海管理在荷兰有着悠久的传统,这使其在全球范围内广为人知。最近,沿海管理者提出了一种保护沙质海岸的新方案,即大型养护计划。本文研究的三个项目都是超大型营养计划的子类型。他们在使用沙子作为滋养海滩的材料方面具有不同程度的创新,即在海滩或前滨使用大量沙子以改善海岸保护性能,同时增加了经济,休闲和自然发展的潜力。深入,定性的访谈是本文的主要数据来源。采访了参与项目决策的人员,以深入了解与项目实现相关的辩论性意义制定过程。本文所涉及的经验工作揭示了不同类型的政策框架是意义形成的主要过程。在一种情况下,政策框架最初限制了参与者与解决方案之间的融合。在另一种情况下,精通含义的行为者成功地将其建议框架化为同时解决各种问题的方案。结果有助于了解如何在荷兰“进行”沿海管理。沿海管理乍一看是技术性的,甚至技术专家制的政策领域。然而,在这个政策领域中,意义的形成和框架的确定尤其重要。除了它们对海岸管理和政策制定的解释性研究的价值外,本论文提出的研究还为从业人员在海岸管理过程中的定位开辟了新途径。

著录项

  • 作者

    Aukes, Ewert Johannes;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号